لا وحدة إلا بالعدل والمساواة ولا وطن إلا بالحرية ولا تقدم لليمن ولا استقرار إلا بالنضال

Mr. Al-Khaiwani having stormed his home and forcibly taken to the headquarters of the Specialized Penal Prosecution ( state security court ) by the manner which everyone knows, had been imprisoned in custody pending charges were not brought against him that time. When brought to trial, he was released by the previous Head of the Specialized Penal Court, Judge, Najeeb Al-Qaderi, after he provided a confirmed commercial assurance, on the basis of authoritative reasons demanded release, including health reasons. He suffers from heart disease, according to the medical report submitted a copy of a document to request release. The decision for release is supported by the decision of the Appellant Division Of Specialized Penal Prosecution contained rejecting of prosecution resumption and support the decision to release issued by the primary court, for the same reasons upon which the later is based.

The set of sentencing hold on 9 / 6 / 2008 accounted to be the meeting of disproving of injustice for our client, attributed to him arbitrarily and unjustly due to the compelling evidence of his innocence. But the Specialized Penal Prosecution is hastened to arrest him from the courtroom after the utterance of the sentence which included sixteen articles, then imprisoned in the Central Prison, contrary to the law.

on mentioned. After two weeks of follow-up, we were surprised, even shocked, when the Attorney General told us that the sentence speech covered access accelerated and gave us a picture of an alleged record of sentencing, including article was added as NO. (17), which states that (to re-jail all the accused releasers for inclusion of the sentence with accelerated access)!! This means that the addition of article 17 had been for the purpose to justify the arbitrary disposal of the prosecution original goal for the arrest of our client

To: imprison him in the Central Prison due to the following evidences.

- The sentence uttered in the meeting does not include except sixteen articles, and this is fixed in recordings of many satellite channels and other media, the recordings were authorized by the President of the Court, the presiding officer, himself. The testimony large gathering of journalists, jurists and politicians who attended the meeting pronunciation.

- The reasons of the uttered s